![]() Unsurprisingly, a vocal segment of the Spider-Man fanbase was not pleased with this news. Raimi's line of thinking was that since Spider-Man already had the ability to climb walls and leap very high, it wasn't much of a stretch to believe that the spider's bite gave him the power to generate and expel his own silk, too. ![]() Interestingly, despite Sam Raimi's love and reverence for the original Spider-Man stories, he decided that he liked this change enough to keep it in the final version of the script (via Screen Rant). Thanks to a grueling five-month training period, however, Maguire developed the superheroic physique that the role required, and was able to persuade even the initially skeptical executives at Sony that he was, indeed, the (Spider-)Man for the job (via Variety). In fact, in an article by the New York Times, Maguire said: "To be honest, I never read a comic book in my entire life before doing this movie." Nevertheless, he took on the role - and even signed on for two sequels - due to his desire to try different roles and bring out the "other aspects of personality like to exploit."ĭavid Server, an editor at the now-defunct entertainment site, told the New York Times that while members of the Spider-fandom did have their reservations about Maguire, it was less about his comics-reading background (or lack thereof) and more about his ability to fill out the Spider-Man suit. In sharp contrast, Tobey Maguire has been quick to admit that he wasn't. Sam Raimi is a self-professed Spider-Man fan, as he admitted in a 2021 Reddit AMA session (via ). The road to Maguire's version of Spider-Man was paved with over two decades' worth of failure - and despite its commercial and critical success, the first "true" Spider-Man movie trilogy was not without its share of challenges and difficulties. That said, things weren't always smooth sailing (or perhaps, swinging) behind the scenes. However, Maguire's take on the wall-crawling superhero left an incredible mark on both the character and the superhero movie genre as a whole, with an entire generation of fans growing up while recognizing him as "their" Spider-Man. That honor goes to Nicholas Hammond, who also portrayed the webslinger in Spider-Man's 1978 television series. Technically, Maguire wasn't the first person to play Peter Parker/Spider-Man in a live-action film. ![]() And at the forefront of these films - and for quite some time, the most commercially successful among them - was Sam Raimi's "Spider-Man" trilogy, which starred Tobey Maguire as the titular protagonist. However, one can argue that Marvel Studios would not have been able to pull off this feat if it weren't for the smaller, self-contained Marvel movies made by other studios in the early 2000s. Films with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.The unprecedented success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe proves that there is a market for films based on superhero comic book properties. There are many things I wished they did differently but I can think of many films that are lot worse. People tend to be like this with many films and Spiderman 3 is a good example of a film that is a mixed bag. Film's are rarely simply black and white, terrible or awful. Many simply ignore the film's positives because it has a lot of negatives but it's unfair to rate a film this way. The special effects on the Sandman are outstanding. "One of the best action scenes ever filmed" is going a bit far but yes, the action is very good. But it also has the best action scenes of the entire trilogy, the fight between Peter and Harry in the beginning was alone better than any other fight scene in the other two movies, while the final battle between Spider-Man and Harry against Venom and the Sandman is one of the best action set pieces ever filmed. Yes, I know the 'emo Spider-Man' scene is cringe-inducing, I know the story is bloated with too many characters, I know the retcon of who shot Uncle Ben was lame and unnecessary. By the way, I want to go on the record as saying that I think Spider-Man 3 is unfairly maligned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |